Its slim, stylish design, widescreen and everyone will fall for that. But I still root for CRT. For me, CRT is still the best. Of course LCD technology is catching up with whats lacking but still, the technology is expensive. Plus, the propaganda of the radiation of CRT boost sales on LCD because of the health concern. Heck...we live in radiation everyday and its already part of our modern life. Minimal CRT radiation wont kill you, or getting you a cancer. People should concern more on the smokes of cigaretes and when walking out there on streets. Radiation from handphone is much more serious, and if its not for marketing new evolution of handphone, they wont bring this matter up.Duh~
There is a BIG possibility for me to buy a new PC this May as I will getting my first bonus. Hehhehe~ So I have been thinking, should I change my monitor to LCD? hmm...I'm a CRT lover. Haha. I'm all over CRT. My TV set is still a CRT, my 2nd monitor for my laptop is CRT...some of my friends root for LCD and say I should go for one. Hmm...is it time already?
For me, CRT is better because it can produce better picture. The color and contrast is much better than LCD. Yeah, its bulky, hideous, ugly...but as long as I get better picture it will all be good. I only use laptop since its the only multimedia thingy I have since my student time. And once, I saw my friend connect a CRT to his laptop as his laptop LCD problem and the picture is 10x better. The color, the tone...everything. And thats the moment I totally devote myself for this old technology.
Hehhe. Another thing is, CRT unlike LCD gives clear image no matter from any angle you watch. You can lay down, watch from side, anywhere and the quality is the same, unless you look from the back...Duh~
LCD in the other hand is much more lighter than CRT, and less eye strain compared to CRT. And also consume less power. I dont care much of this though, since the monitor is sticked in only one place and not going to move it around. But thats just where it ends. Good point of LCD is lower power consumption and less eye strain after watching for a period of time. Much more expensive LCD will give good picture quality matching CRT. But still, its the money we are talking about.
People going for LCD to get better graphics are bull and nonsense. Its just a marketing strategy. Even pros will use CRT as LCD is still behind in quality. Try to watch normal videos in those so called HD LCD TV...the image is pathetic. It is sure not something I would pay for. If the meaning to get beautiful picture is to spend every cent of my hard earned money..thats just stupid. Its better to stay with CRT and watch normal quality video with very good picture.
So, for upgrade to LCD during this time...maybe a No no for me. Haha. To upgrade, better make it really satisfying. If its just for the sake of getting LCD because everybody has one...thats just wasting money. For me, an upgrade is something you'll satisfy for a long period...maybe 3-4 years. And with LCD is still expensive ( a good one) I think I'll stick with CRT monitors.
With the same price of LCD, I can get a larger CRT. RM485 for a 17" LCD? hmm...too pricey. Yes, I can get cheaper LCD but in long run, this LCD is getting cheaper and its not worth it haha...wat the heck i'm using large monitor though. hmm..17" or 19" CRT is enough for me. And it will only cost me RM100. guahahahaha
CRT pros:
Better picture, color
Good viewing angle
High refresh rate
CRT cons:
Heavy, bulky, ugly
high power consumption
eye straining after some time
radiation???
LCD pros:
Lightweight, stylish
low power
less eyestrain
LCD cons:
Have certain resolution
Blur image on fast moving objects
Loss in color quality
Bad viewing angle (not same case for more expensive LCD)
Pricey~
For whole list of Pros and Cons between LCD and CRT, do visit this link here --> HERE
It will totally help if you are deciding between CRT and LCD...for me, CRT all the way~
-LB-
17 comments:
angkat jek lcd tv... ape monitor2 lagi...
crt mmg lawa, tapi dihadapan HDTV FULL HD 1080p RES... apelah sangat CRT
dimana lah anda nak dapatkan sumber2 video file HD tu encik anonymous...
nak kena download? nak beli bluray disc?
1 bluray berapa ringgit bro..
astro ada HD ke?
berapa reso siaran tv 3?
ahahahaha...lcd hdtv memang la lawa, tapi kena lah padan dgn source video dia. apaa raa..tu pun tataw fikir
sebab tu dalam post itu ada kata...teknologi lcd yang tiptop...masih mahal...still expensive. tak berbaloi nak upgrade skarang ni.huhuhu
tahun lepas lcd masih cam ayam mahal...hari ni da 1/2 price dah, with better quality.
nak upgrade, biarlah suatu teknologi tu dah stabil dulu...biarkan mereka2 yang kaya membeli barangan2 eksperimen ni..huhuhu
kita yang miskin2 beli time dah betul2 ok je...
bleh~
ahhahhaha..
saya suka barang eksperimen..
baru la boleh berlagak..
saya ade barag yg updater..
org berlagak selalu miskin
saya suka murah2 saja...ahaha
@encik langkahbaru:
adakah encik tidak perasan yang malaysia juga sedang mengorak langkah kearah Hi Def Res?
bukan nak kata saya buat info sendiri tapi ini dikatakan sendiri oleh menteri penyiaran (bodoh) malaysia..
jadi, encik juga perlu fikirkan.. adakah masih perlu encik menggunakan CRT?
Masalah kata nak tunggu tuh, boleh jek... tapi sampai bila? sampai harganya stabil? bila? satu masalah teknologi adalah ianya takkan berhenti disatu tahap dan melihat timing "bila" baru berubah adalah satu perkara yang susah. Tidak saya katakan mustahil, tapi ianya adalah susah.
membeli teknologi bermakna encik membeli liabiliti, bukan asset, sepertilah encik membeli kereta, rumah dan sebagainya. Harganya tidak akan naik mengikut masa, tapi akan turun. Biar "bila" encik beli sekalipon, encik tetap akan rugi.
rumah adalah asset...harga akan naik
"adakah encik tidak perasan yang malaysia juga sedang mengorak langkah kearah Hi Def Res?"
ayat di atas terang2 menyatakan "sedang mengorak langkah", so kalau beli sekarang pun masih tak berbaloi.uhuhu~..beli sekarang gamba macam tu jugak. lagi 2 tahun baru siap itu hi def reso...then masa tu sume lcd dah tiptop...dan murah..dan anda rugi kerana harga anda beli mahal.
alaa...2 tahun lagi worth the wait la. masa tu nanti, HD signal dah siap, lcd maybe more to plasma yg gamba lagi lawa, takde angle viewing problem. masa tu nanti sume dah murah...macam henset...
macam sekarang, tv bukan lagi satu teknologi canggih, tapi keperluan..
mungkin lagi 2 tahun, lcd bukan canggih, tapi normaliti...
saya tak mampu, sebab tu saya tunggu harga turun.uhuhu~
btw, semalam pergi lowyat. baca2 komen korang then ada duit lebih. so g la usha2 lcd...puas pusing, harga 400 gamba macam tahi. pandang senget sikit dah gelap. jadah...aku mau tgk dalam bilik kene tgk straight ja ka? aiyaa...mau baring2 guling2, sume orang leh tgk baru bes.
tgk satu lcd tu cun, rm450...angle pun ok laa...but still..uhuhu..mahal ler..tunggu aku kaya lah nanti.ahahaha~
kesimpulan: saya masih perlukan crt sebab lcd gambar tahi, penuh dgn pixel2, kotak2 dan saya sakit hati bile saya bayar mahal untuk kualiti yang tak sepadan harga.uhuhu~
malaysia mengorak langkah ke arah HD res.... tapi rancangan tetap bodoh cam dulu kala....
tak guna gak kalo nak tgk sume mende bodoh dlm HD res... tak sedap gak...
sbb content show tu BODOH...selawa mana quolity or kuritii ke ape ke gambarnya.... tetap takkan sedap..
pandangan di atas adalah yang paling bernas saya pernah baca...
tahniah...
Wei! Mana ada tv crt dapat lawan full hdtv! Sekarang ni astro dah ada hd channel la. And masalah blur object kat lcd tv tu, kat tv lcd yang cap ayam saja & model lama je. Sekarang ni dah ada 200hz++ punya refresh rate so gambar & movement licin gila. Masalah vieweng angle pulak, sekarang ni dah ada TV HD LCD yang ada 175 degree vieweng angle. So kesimpulannya, HDTV menang, CRT sucks! Sukati ko je cakap CRT better picture quality. Aku ada sony bravia full HDTV 200hz motionflow. Kualiti gambar memang clear gila. So, kalau X mampu takyah nak kutuk HDTV.
n tolong refer aku ye reply yg awal2....tu explain sume yg lagi bagus...
This is ps3_owner. Wei! Lupa pulak. kau post mende ni awal tahun kan? Ko nak tau tak? Tahun 2008 dah ada full HD LCD yang ada motionflow. Ko ni memang ketinggalan la bro. Sebab tu aku heran ko cakap CRT produce better quality than lcd. Tahun lepas pun lcd ni bukannya mahal sangat. Kalo ko cakap tanak beli lcd (yg ada hd) ni sebab tak dapat nak afford harga blu-ray, aku leh terima la. Sebab bende macam ni memang diciptakan utk golongan yg berpendapatan LUMAYAN sahaja.
p/s: Peace. Jangan marah2, tak baik.
ok la..peace
tapi, tgk lcd release 2008, even dgn motionflow, gambar stil pixelite..even though HD. S n T series bravia contoh nya.
point 1: tak berbaloi beli, since masih delopment stage.
tapi, skarang, they have make all they could with LCD...n next is LED...which u can find latest LCD to produce perfect graphic.
reason pakai CRT - no pixelite
nice contrast n brightness
sharp image reproduction.
reason tanak pakai LCD dulu - pixelite, contrast sucks, brightness tak bagus.
tapi sekarang da keluar sony w series n v series contohnya...gamba produce sangat sharp...
so..walaupun harga rm5000 utk 40", dah berbaloi beli sebab end stage development, conversion era for new technology - LED display
1st LED display yg samsung keluar kan pun kurang bagus - refer 6 series. gambar masih pixelite...
tapi samsung 7 series sangat berbaloi beli. gamba memang bagus.
tapi, compare price n image kualiti - sony bravia W series sangat boleh compare dgn samsung 7 series. dua2 gamba sangat berbaloi beli...
so aku decide angkat sony bravia W series.
kesimpulan, masa aku wat post tu, technology LCD masih tak lawa compare dgn CRT...
CRT gamba memang perfect. try sumbat bluray main kat CRT...percaya la..gamba memang lawa giler. 2008, ko pakai bluray pun gamba tak cukup lawa lagi kat LCD tu. sakit je mata tgk kotak2 tu...
sony engine baru ni dia akan process gamba jadi lagi sharp eventhough bukan HD source.
jadi...sangat la berbaloi beli sekarang banding dulu.
ni bukan sebab tak mampu nak beli, tapi tunggu technology stable. n skarang ni la yg aku katakan technology stable...
contoh la...kau berkemampuan, ko beli LCD sebab kejar technology. n LCD yg ko beli tu S series (aku kasi contoh model sony)...2bulan pastu kuar T series, then sebulan lagi kuar V series, pastu kuar W...n W adalah model paling tiptop..memang paling jelas kualiti...
so, kalau kira sebab memang ko kaya, leh la beli semua dari S series sampai W series. Tapi, rugi macam tu je la...
series, kalau org bagi aku free S series or T series tu pun kalau leh aku taknak amik...sakit mata je...prefer TV crt lama. dah tentu gamba jelas n terang..tade pecah2.
200HZ motionflow mmg agak baru lagi...setahun lebih...
try letak sebelah CRT...gamba lebih kurang CRT je...
aku tak tau la...sebab aku memang spanjang masa kat kilang n tgk model2 tv yg ada. sume depends kat model n engine...latest gamba lawa. lama nye gamba tak lawa. sng cter.
n pasal source HD..beli tahun lepas, astro tak kuar lagi HD. beli thn ni astro da kuar HD...boleh utilize.
kalo beli thun lpas, then install kat rumah...tgk gamba pecah2, bintik2, kotak2...tak bes lak rasanya bayar mahal2 gitu.. baik beli time bila pasang gamba terus dapat cantik...bukan sepanjang masa nak dok tgk bluray je...tu pun skit sangat source. movie ada la berapa kerat da release bluray.
tapi ko nak beli LCD HD ikut suka la, duit ko. aku tak cakap pon tak bagus...
tapi pos asal aku ni pasal aku nak replace crt monitor ke tak dgn LCD monitor. kita dok hujah pn da lari topik jauh sangat citer pasal HDTV...
ptengahan thn depan LCD monitor lak da stable. baru puas nak tgk. aku tiap2 bulan g sevey lcd monitor...sume pada pandangan aku teruk lagi. masih lagi lawa CRT. since dgn vid HD CRT aku dapat kasi gamba yg puas.
aku tgk display kat kedai comp, kai video good quality pun gamba ampeh...
ada la jumpa model bagus - fujitsu. memang nak angkat...skali lari bajet lak..harga sampai 600...
tak jadi angkat...thn dpan banyak da kualiti camtu baru bebaloi angkat. technology kejar tak kemana...
baik tunggu yg betul2 dpat ganti technology lama sebelum convert.
sama macam transition windows 98 to windows xp...sebelum tu kuar ME, 2000...baru XP...itu pun XP SP2 baru stabil...so baru tuka kepada XP2..
aku bukan jenis kejar tech. aku jenis suka stability...tanak nyusahkan diri pastu nyesal sbb tambah2 leceh.
so thn lepas ramai2 convert to vista...aku tak...sebab aku tau vista sucks...so aku tunggu windows 7...n puas ati...
aku rasa aku wat cara bijak...bukan membuta tuli je...tu je la aku rasa..n bukan ko sorg je hentam aku pasal aku fan CRT...ramai lagi kawan tempat keje bash aku...
aku slambe kan aje...diorg dulu angkat T series, skang aku pakai W...sapa yg puas ati..aku ke diorg?
janji aku puas...
Bro, secara jujur aku cakap. Kalau aku layan movie yang resolusi rendah, aku pakai crt je. Kalau aku nak layan Full HD video/ blu-ray or nak main ps3 baru aku guna LCD Full HD.
ye..itu la maksud sebenar aku...
source untuk media HD masih lagi sikit. tambah lagi masa thn 2008...
itu le point sebenar..
jadi tujuan orang berlumba2 untuk dapatkan LCD untuk layan kualiti gamba terbaik jadi takde makna...sebab sikit sangat source HD.
sekarang ni, at least astro suda ada HD...baru la berbaloi pakai. tambah lak harga da murah banding 2008 dgn kualiti yg lagi superb...
Post a Comment